Newsletter data deletion via missing CSRF validation
Published Feb 24, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
CSRF in Mail Magazine Management Plugin 1.0.0 through 1.0.4 and 4.0.0 through 4.1.1 allows remote attackers to delete newsletter data. The template and delivery-history deletion controllers accept state-changing requests without validating an anti-CSRF token. Exploitation requires an administrator who is signed in to the host EC-CUBE site to visit a crafted page, after which templates or transmitted-history records are deleted with that administrator's session.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Mail Magazine Management Plugin 1.0.0 through 1.0.4 and 4.0.0 through 4.1.1 allows remote attackers to delete newsletter data. The template and delivery-history deletion controllers accept state-changing requests without validating an anti-CSRF token. Exploitation requires an administrator who is signed in to the host EC-CUBE site to visit a crafted page, after which templates or transmitted-history records are deleted with that administrator's session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-21179
- Published
- Feb 24, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- EC-CUBE CO.,LTD.
- Product
- Mail Magazine Management Plugin
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 24, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=ver4.0.0 to 4.1.1 (for EC-CUBE 4 series) and ver1.0.0 to 1.0.4 (for EC-CUBE 3 series)
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo