Stored cross-site scripting via forged admin request
Published Jun 13, 2022 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Scriptcoil Mobile browser color select 1.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to store malicious scripts. The admin_update_data() function accepts a forged settings request without validating a WordPress nonce and stores attacker-controlled input for later rendering. Successful exploitation requires an authenticated site administrator to follow a crafted link or visit an attacker-controlled page, causing the stored script to execute in the affected site's browser context.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Scriptcoil Mobile browser color select 1.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to store malicious scripts. The admin_update_data() function accepts a forged settings request without validating a WordPress nonce and stores attacker-controlled input for later rendering. Successful exploitation requires an authenticated site administrator to follow a crafted link or visit an attacker-controlled page, causing the stored script to execute in the affected site's browser context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-1969
- Published
- Jun 13, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Scriptcoil
- Product
- Mobile browser color select
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 13, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo