Stored XSS via unescaped scroller content ID
Published Jun 13, 2022 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Stored XSS in Thomas Geiger Google Tag Manager for WordPress 1.15.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts. The public/frontend.php code insufficiently escapes the stored gtm4wp-options[scroller-contentid] setting before placing it in generated pages. Administrator access and a multisite or other configuration that disables unfiltered_html are required, and the injected script runs in browsers that load the affected output.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Thomas Geiger Google Tag Manager for WordPress 1.15.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts. The public/frontend.php code insufficiently escapes the stored gtm4wp-options[scroller-contentid] setting before placing it in generated pages. Administrator access and a multisite or other configuration that disables unfiltered_html are required, and the injected script runs in browsers that load the affected output.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-1961
- Published
- Jun 13, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Thomas Geiger
- Product
- Google Tag Manager for WordPress
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 13, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.15.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo