Unauthenticated reflected script execution via unsanitized search parameter
Published Jun 13, 2022 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Cross-site scripting in Google Tag Manager for WordPress 1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via a crafted search parameter. The public/frontend.php code copies the s search parameter into the analytics data layer without sufficient sanitization or output escaping, reflecting attacker-controlled markup into rendered pages. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated attacker to induce a visitor to load a crafted search URL, allowing script execution in the site context with confidentiality and integrity impact but no reported availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site scripting in Google Tag Manager for WordPress 1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via a crafted search parameter. The public/frontend.php code copies the s search parameter into the analytics data layer without sufficient sanitization or output escaping, reflecting attacker-controlled markup into rendered pages. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated attacker to induce a visitor to load a crafted search URL, allowing script execution in the site context with confidentiality and integrity impact but no reported availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-1707
- Published
- Jun 13, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Thomas Geiger
- Product
- Google Tag Manager for WordPress
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 13, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.15
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo