Policy bypass via misidentified runtime linker
Published Aug 29, 2022 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Improper runtime-linker detection in fapolicyd before 1.1.2 allows local users to execute applications that policy should block. The dyn_linker.m4 build macro resolves only /usr/lib64/ld-2.*.so, so changed glibc linker names can leave SYSTEM_LD_SO pointing at the wrong path and disable the ld_so matcher. A local user must invoke an application through the unrecognized runtime linker; the result is execution of code that the active allowlisting policy otherwise denies.
Summary
What happened
Improper runtime-linker detection in fapolicyd before 1.1.2 allows local users to execute applications that policy should block. The dyn_linker.m4 build macro resolves only /usr/lib64/ld-2.*.so, so changed glibc linker names can leave SYSTEM_LD_SO pointing at the wrong path and disable the ld_so matcher. A local user must invoke an application through the unrecognized runtime linker; the result is execution of code that the active allowlisting policy otherwise denies.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-1117
- Published
- Aug 29, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Fapolicyd Project
- Product
- fapolicyd
- Classifications
- CWE-552, T1218
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 29, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Fixed in v1.1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo