Kernel-memory disclosure via miscalculated RPC headers
Published Aug 29, 2022 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Information disclosure in Linux Kernel before 5.8-rc6 allows local users to read kernel memory through NFS over RDMA file reads. The rpcrdma_max_call_header_size and rpcrdma_max_reply_header_size functions overwrite, rather than accumulate, header-size terms, undersizing RPC payload headers. A normal local user must read a short file through NFS over RDMA against a susceptible server; disclosed bytes can include other file contents or kernel data.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in Linux Kernel before 5.8-rc6 allows local users to read kernel memory through NFS over RDMA file reads. The rpcrdma_max_call_header_size and rpcrdma_max_reply_header_size functions overwrite, rather than accumulate, header-size terms, undersizing RPC payload headers. A normal local user must read a short file through NFS over RDMA against a susceptible server; disclosed bytes can include other file contents or kernel data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-0812
- Published
- Aug 29, 2022
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-200, T1005
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 29, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Fixed in v5.8-rc6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo