Admin entry deletion via missing nonce checks
Published Apr 12, 2022 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Visual Form Builder before 3.0.8 allows remote attackers to alter form entries through crafted requests. The WordPress admin entry handlers for trash, permanent delete, and restore do not validate a nonce, so requests forged from an attacker-controlled page execute with the logged-in session. A logged-in administrator or editor must load the crafted request; successful attacks can delete, permanently remove, or restore arbitrary entries, affecting form-data integrity and availability.
Summary
What happened
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Visual Form Builder before 3.0.8 allows remote attackers to alter form entries through crafted requests. The WordPress admin entry handlers for trash, permanent delete, and restore do not validate a nonce, so requests forged from an attacker-controlled page execute with the logged-in session. A logged-in administrator or editor must load the crafted request; successful attacks can delete, permanently remove, or restore arbitrary entries, affecting form-data integrity and availability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-0141
- Published
- Apr 12, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Matthew Muro
- Product
- Visual Form Builder
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 12, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.0.8 <3.0.8
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- WPScan CSRF proof of concept for Visual Form Builder entriesproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo