Kernel warning via unhandled monitor interface
Published Feb 28, 2024 · Updated May 11, 2026
Improper interface-type handling in Linux kernel 5.12 through 5.12.3 allows local users to trigger a kernel warning. mt76_connac_mcu_uni_add_dev sends a monitor interface through a connection-type switch that lacks a monitor case and invokes its default WARN_ON path. The path requires compatible mt76 Connac wireless hardware and permission to add and open a monitor interface; the published trace establishes a warning, not a crash.
Summary
What happened
Improper interface-type handling in Linux kernel 5.12 through 5.12.3 allows local users to trigger a kernel warning. mt76_connac_mcu_uni_add_dev sends a monitor interface through a connection-type switch that lacks a monitor case and invokes its default WARN_ON path. The path requires compatible mt76 Connac wireless hardware and permission to add and open a monitor interface; the published trace establishes a warning, not a crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-47029
- Published
- Feb 28, 2024
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-20
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 28, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.12
- Affected versionversion=d0e274af2f2e44b9d496f5d2c0431fdd2ea76fb8 <2554b9cb4b5e097c6071ec3ed5bc7c665c477ca7
- Affected versionversion=d0e274af2f2e44b9d496f5d2c0431fdd2ea76fb8 <c996f0346e40e3b1ac2ebaf0681df898fb157f60
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo