Settings changes and data export via missing nonces
Published Jul 12, 2023 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in WP Prayer 1.6.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to change settings and export data via forged requests. The save() and export() functions omit or incorrectly validate WordPress nonces, so they accept state-changing requests without confirming their origin. Exploitation requires a site administrator to act on an attacker-controlled link or equivalent request, and the documented consequence is limited to plugin-setting changes and data export.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in WP Prayer 1.6.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to change settings and export data via forged requests. The save() and export() functions omit or incorrectly validate WordPress nonces, so they accept state-changing requests without confirming their origin. Exploitation requires a site administrator to act on an attacker-controlled link or equivalent request, and the documented consequence is limited to plugin-setting changes and data export.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-4412
- Published
- Jul 12, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Go Prayer
- Product
- WP Prayer
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 12, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.6.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo