Metadata modification via missing nonce validation
Published Jul 1, 2023 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
CSRF in Marco Milesi Amministrazione Trasparente 7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify metadata through a forged request. The at_save_aturl_meta() function accepts state-changing input without correctly validating a WordPress nonce, causing attacker-supplied metadata to be saved under an administrator's session. An administrator must be authenticated and induced to submit the forged request, and the demonstrated consequence is unauthorized metadata modification.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Marco Milesi Amministrazione Trasparente 7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify metadata through a forged request. The at_save_aturl_meta() function accepts state-changing input without correctly validating a WordPress nonce, causing attacker-supplied metadata to be saved under an administrator's session. An administrator must be authenticated and induced to submit the forged request, and the demonstrated consequence is unauthorized metadata modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-4398
- Published
- Jul 1, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Marco Milesi
- Product
- Amministrazione Trasparente
- Classifications
- CWE-352
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 1, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=7.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo