Custom-field metadata modification via missing nonce validation
Published Jul 1, 2023 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in richardgabriel Locations 3.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to update custom-field metadata. The saveCustomFields() function processes a forged request without valid WordPress nonce verification and writes submitted custom-field metadata. Exploitation requires an administrator to submit the forged request, such as by following a malicious link, and is limited to unauthorized metadata changes.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in richardgabriel Locations 3.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to update custom-field metadata. The saveCustomFields() function processes a forged request without valid WordPress nonce verification and writes submitted custom-field metadata. Exploitation requires an administrator to submit the forged request, such as by following a malicious link, and is limited to unauthorized metadata changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-4394
- Published
- Jul 1, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- richardgabriel
- Product
- Locations
- Classifications
- T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 1, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.2.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- NinTechNet CSRF technical descriptionproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo