Topic-page disruption via missing footnote link
Published Dec 14, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Improper missing-value handling in Discourse Footnote before 0.2 allows remote authenticated users to disrupt topic-page rendering. Anchor-wrapped inline footnotes produce nested links that Nokogiri removes, while the client script dereferences the missing link without a null check. Posting crafted footnote markup is required, and affected readers encounter a JavaScript error rather than data disclosure or modification.
Summary
What happened
Improper missing-value handling in Discourse Footnote before 0.2 allows remote authenticated users to disrupt topic-page rendering. Anchor-wrapped inline footnotes produce nested links that Nokogiri removes, while the client script dereferences the missing link without a null check. Posting crafted footnote markup is required, and affected readers encounter a JavaScript error rather than data disclosure or modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-43827
- Published
- Dec 14, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Discourse
- Product
- Discourse Footnote
- Classifications
- CWE-230, CWE-755, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 14, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo