Application crash via raw integer size overflow
Published Nov 15, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Buffer overflow in GNU GMP 6.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to crash 32-bit applications via crafted raw-integer input. In mpz/inp_raw.c, abs_csize multiplied by eight wraps while calculating abs_xsize, causing MPZ_NEWALLOC to reserve too little space and placing the read pointer before the allocation. Exposure requires a 32-bit process that passes attacker-controlled data to mpz_inp_raw; the demonstrated consequence is process termination by segmentation fault.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in GNU GMP 6.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to crash 32-bit applications via crafted raw-integer input. In mpz/inp_raw.c, abs_csize multiplied by eight wraps while calculating abs_xsize, causing MPZ_NEWALLOC to reserve too little space and placing the read pointer before the allocation. Exposure requires a 32-bit process that passes attacker-controlled data to mpz_inp_raw; the demonstrated consequence is process termination by segmentation fault.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-43618
- Published
- Nov 15, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 15, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- mpz_inp_raw segmentation-fault reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo