Arbitrary signature forgery via missing range checks
Published Nov 9, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Improper signature verification in Stark Bank Python ECDSA before 2.0.1 allows attackers to forge signatures via zero-valued components. The verify function accepts r and s without enforcing the required 1-to-n-minus-1 range; Math.inv returns zero for s=0, so the final comparison reduces to 0==0. Any caller that trusts the library's Boolean result can accept an arbitrary message under any public key, bypassing the application's signature-based trust decision.
Summary
What happened
Improper signature verification in Stark Bank Python ECDSA before 2.0.1 allows attackers to forge signatures via zero-valued components. The verify function accepts r and s without enforcing the required 1-to-n-minus-1 range; Math.inv returns zero for s=0, so the final comparison reduces to 0==0. Any caller that trusts the library's Boolean result can accept an arbitrary message under any public key, bypassing the application's signature-based trust decision.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-43572
- Published
- Nov 9, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-347
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 9, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- NCC Group zero-signature proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo