Cross-site request forgery via disabled CSRF
Published Dec 21, 2022 · Updated Apr 14, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Katlings pyambic-pentameter with an unspecified version allows remote attackers to alter actions via crafted POST requests. The Flask app disabled WTF-CSRF protection and its POST forms omitted CSRF tokens until the referenced commit enabled a secret key and inserted tokens into each form. Exploitation requires a victim to load an attacker-controlled page while interacting with the application, allowing unauthorized state-changing requests but no demonstrated direct server takeover.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Katlings pyambic-pentameter with an unspecified version allows remote attackers to alter actions via crafted POST requests. The Flask app disabled WTF-CSRF protection and its POST forms omitted CSRF tokens until the referenced commit enabled a secret key and inserted tokens into each form. Exploitation requires a victim to load an attacker-controlled page while interacting with the application, allowing unauthorized state-changing requests but no demonstrated direct server takeover.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-4275
- Published
- Dec 21, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 14, 2025
- Vendor
- Katlings
- Product
- pyambic-pentameter
- Classifications
- CWE-863, CWE-352, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 21, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 14, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo