UPF service interruption via unchecked PFCP length
Published Oct 7, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Stack buffer overflow in Open5GS 1.0.0 through 2.3.3 allows remote attackers to interrupt UPF service via crafted PFCP requests. ogs_fqdn_parse treats the first byte of a client-supplied PDI Network Instance as a copy length and passes it to memcpy without validating it against the 100-byte stack destination. Network access to UDP port 8805 is required; a PFCP Association Setup followed by a crafted Session Establishment request corrupts the UPF stack and denies subscriber service.
Summary
What happened
Stack buffer overflow in Open5GS 1.0.0 through 2.3.3 allows remote attackers to interrupt UPF service via crafted PFCP requests. ogs_fqdn_parse treats the first byte of a client-supplied PDI Network Instance as a copy length and passes it to memcpy without validating it against the 100-byte stack destination. Network access to UDP port 8805 is required; a PFCP Association Setup followed by a crafted Session Establishment request corrupts the UPF stack and denies subscriber service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-41794
- Published
- Oct 7, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 7, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- NCC Group PFCP Session Establishment proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo