Service crash via unterminated JACK client name
Published Dec 17, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Buffer overflow in Pyo before 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to crash the JACK-backed audio server via an overlong client name. In Server_jack_init in src/engine/ad_jack.c, strncpy copies up to 31 bytes into an uninitialized 32-byte client_name buffer without guaranteeing a null terminator before jack_client_open reads it. Exploitation requires control of the server name and execution of the JACK backend initialization path, and the documented consequence is denial of service only.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in Pyo before 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to crash the JACK-backed audio server via an overlong client name. In Server_jack_init in src/engine/ad_jack.c, strncpy copies up to 31 bytes into an uninitialized 32-byte client_name buffer without guaranteeing a null terminator before jack_client_open reads it. Exploitation requires control of the server name and execution of the JACK backend initialization path, and the documented consequence is denial of service only.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-41498
- Published
- Dec 17, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 17, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo