Unauthenticated root code execution via setLanguage injection
Published Mar 7, 2022 · Updated Sep 17, 2024
Command injection in TP-Link Tapo C200 firmware 1.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication. The uhttpd setLanguage handler embeds attacker-controlled JSON directly in a ubus shell command executed through popen without neutralizing single quotes. A single HTTPS POST to the root path reaches the handler before login, and uhttpd runs as root, granting full control of the camera.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in TP-Link Tapo C200 firmware 1.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication. The uhttpd setLanguage handler embeds attacker-controlled JSON directly in a ubus shell command executed through popen without neutralizing single quotes. A single HTTPS POST to the root path reaches the handler before login, and uhttpd runs as root, granting full control of the camera.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-4045
- Published
- Mar 7, 2022
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2024
- Vendor
- TP-Link
- Product
- Tapo C200
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 7, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 11, 2022Exploitation reportedFortiGuard IPS spike for Tapo C200 command injection
- Sep 17, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.15 <=1.15
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- pwnTapo.pyfunctional · validated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Reported exploitation
- FortiGuard IPS spike for Tapo C200 command injectionreported exploitation
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo