Access-control bypass via ambiguous HTTP framing
Published Sep 16, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
HTTP request smuggling in mitmproxy 7.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass proxy event-hook controls via ambiguous HTTP messages. Its HTTP/1 parser accepts messages carrying both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers, allowing downstream peers to split an embedded request that mitmproxy retains inside another message body. Exposure requires mitmproxy to protect an HTTP/1 service; the hidden request bypasses request-list visibility and event-hook access controls or sanitization.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in mitmproxy 7.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass proxy event-hook controls via ambiguous HTTP messages. Its HTTP/1 parser accepts messages carrying both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers, allowing downstream peers to split an embedded request that mitmproxy retains inside another message body. Exposure requires mitmproxy to protect an HTTP/1 service; the hidden request bypasses request-list visibility and event-hook access controls or sanitization.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-39214
- Published
- Sep 16, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- mitmproxy
- Product
- mitmproxy
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 16, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 7.0.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo