Username enumeration via response discrepancies
Published Feb 4, 2022 · Updated Sep 16, 2024
Observable response discrepancies in IBM Guardium Data Encryption Server 5.0.0.2 allow remote attackers to enumerate usernames. The server's unauthenticated request handling returns distinguishable responses for different account states, but IBM has not published the affected endpoint or exact response difference. Network access without authentication is sufficient; the documented consequence is account-name disclosure, with no integrity or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Observable response discrepancies in IBM Guardium Data Encryption Server 5.0.0.2 allow remote attackers to enumerate usernames. The server's unauthenticated request handling returns distinguishable responses for different account states, but IBM has not published the affected endpoint or exact response difference. Network access without authentication is sufficient; the documented consequence is account-name disclosure, with no integrity or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-39021
- Published
- Feb 4, 2022
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2024
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- IBM Guardium Data Encryption
- Classifications
- CWE-203, T1087
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 4, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 16, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.0.0.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo