Denial of service via concurrency issue
Published Nov 30, 2021 · Updated Sep 16, 2024
Denial of service in IBM MQ Appliance 9.2 CD and 9.2 LTS allows local attackers to interrupt service via a concurrency issue. IBM identifies a concurrency defect but does not publish the affected routine or triggering input. Local access with no user interaction is required, and the documented consequence is loss of service availability without confidentiality or integrity impact.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in IBM MQ Appliance 9.2 CD and 9.2 LTS allows local attackers to interrupt service via a concurrency issue. IBM identifies a concurrency defect but does not publish the affected routine or triggering input. Local access with no user interaction is required, and the documented consequence is loss of service availability without confidentiality or integrity impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-38958
- Published
- Nov 30, 2021
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2024
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- IBM MQ Appliance
- Classifications
- T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 30, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 16, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=9.2.0.0
- Affected versionversion=9.2.0.1
- Affected versionversion=9.2.0.2
- Affected versionversion=9.2.0.3
- Affected versionversion=9.2.1
- Affected versionversion=9.2.2
- Affected versionversion=9.2.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo