Unauthenticated service interruption via GraphQL field
Published Sep 1, 2021 · Updated Sep 16, 2024
Improper input validation in Adobe Commerce 2.4.2-p1 and earlier allows remote attackers to interrupt service through a GraphQL field. Adobe identifies GraphQL field processing as the locus but has not disclosed the field, rejected value, or faulty validation operation. Unauthenticated network requests require no user interaction and affect availability only; the public record does not distinguish a hang from a crash.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in Adobe Commerce 2.4.2-p1 and earlier allows remote attackers to interrupt service through a GraphQL field. Adobe identifies GraphQL field processing as the locus but has not disclosed the field, rejected value, or faulty validation operation. Unauthenticated network requests require no user interaction and affect availability only; the public record does not distinguish a hang from a crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-36044
- Published
- Sep 1, 2021
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2024
- Vendor
- Adobe
- Product
- Adobe Commerce
- Classifications
- CWE-20, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 1, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 16, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=2.3.7
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=2.4.2
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=2.4.2-p1
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=None
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo