LLDP memory corruption via missing length checks
Published Oct 6, 2021 · Updated Nov 7, 2024
Memory corruption in Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches allows adjacent attackers to corrupt LLDP databases via crafted LLDP packets. Missing length validation while processing LLDP messages permits an out-of-bounds read of packet data into the internal LLDP database. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated attacker on the same Layer 2 broadcast domain and can corrupt switch state; Cisco reports no public exploitation.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches allows adjacent attackers to corrupt LLDP databases via crafted LLDP packets. Missing length validation while processing LLDP messages permits an out-of-bounds read of packet data into the internal LLDP database. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated attacker on the same Layer 2 broadcast domain and can corrupt switch state; Cisco reports no public exploitation.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-34777
- Published
- Oct 6, 2021
- Updated
- Nov 7, 2024
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Small Business 200 Series Smart Switches
- Classifications
- CWE-120, CWE-125, T1565
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 6, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 7, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo