LLDP database corruption via missing length validation
Published Oct 6, 2021 · Updated Nov 7, 2024
Buffer overflow in Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches allows attackers to corrupt the LLDP database via crafted packets. The LLDP parser omits message-length validation and reads beyond valid packet data, corrupting entries in the internal LLDP database. Exploitation requires the same Layer 2 broadcast domain and an enabled LLDP service, which Cisco enables by default on LAN ports.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches allows attackers to corrupt the LLDP database via crafted packets. The LLDP parser omits message-length validation and reads beyond valid packet data, corrupting entries in the internal LLDP database. Exploitation requires the same Layer 2 broadcast domain and an enabled LLDP service, which Cisco enables by default on LAN ports.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-34775
- Published
- Oct 6, 2021
- Updated
- Nov 7, 2024
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Small Business 200 Series Smart Switches
- Classifications
- CWE-120
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 6, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 7, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo