Meter-reading falsification via undetected wireless replay
Published Sep 16, 2021 · Updated Sep 16, 2024
Insufficient data-authenticity verification in ENBRA EWM 1.7.29 allows physically proximate attackers to falsify readings via replayed frames. EWM accepts repeated wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 sensor data without detecting that it was previously received and replaces the sensor timestamp with the new readout time. Exploitation requires radio proximity to inject a captured meter frame, and the resulting stale data appears current, compromising meter-reading integrity without reported disclosure or interruption.
Summary
What happened
Insufficient data-authenticity verification in ENBRA EWM 1.7.29 allows physically proximate attackers to falsify readings via replayed frames. EWM accepts repeated wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 sensor data without detecting that it was previously received and replaces the sensor timestamp with the new readout time. Exploitation requires radio proximity to inject a captured meter frame, and the resulting stale data appears current, compromising meter-reading integrity without reported disclosure or interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-34572
- Published
- Sep 16, 2021
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2024
- Vendor
- ENBRA
- Product
- EWM
- Classifications
- CWE-345, T1565.002
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 16, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 16, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=03.11.2019
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo