Denial of service via crafted-file memory leak
Published Jul 26, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Memory leak in fill_buffer() in lrzip 0.641 allows local users to cause denial of service by supplying a crafted archive. While testing the archive, fill_buffer() allocates a 24-byte object that remains unreleased after decompression fails. Opening or testing the crafted file is required, and the demonstrated consequence is unreleased process memory rather than code execution or data access.
Summary
What happened
Memory leak in fill_buffer() in lrzip 0.641 allows local users to cause denial of service by supplying a crafted archive. While testing the archive, fill_buffer() allocates a 24-byte object that remains unreleased after decompression fails. Opening or testing the crafted file is required, and the demonstrated consequence is unreleased process memory rather than code execution or data access.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-33451
- Published
- Jul 26, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-401, T1499.004, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 26, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- lrzip fill_buffer memory-leak reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo