Cross-site scripting via unescaped notebook fields
Published Aug 18, 2022 · Updated Sep 2, 2024
Cross-site scripting in Project Jupyter nbconvert 6.2 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute scripts via a crafted notebook. Multiple metadata and output fields are inserted into Jinja HTML templates without escaping, allowing markup to break out of title, attribute, and script contexts. Exploitation requires an attacker-controlled notebook to be converted to HTML and served without a secure content security policy, after which a viewer loads the injected script.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site scripting in Project Jupyter nbconvert 6.2 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute scripts via a crafted notebook. Multiple metadata and output fields are inserted into Jinja HTML templates without escaping, allowing markup to break out of title, attribute, and script contexts. Exploitation requires an attacker-controlled notebook to be converted to HTML and served without a secure content security policy, after which a viewer loads the injected script.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-32862
- Published
- Aug 18, 2022
- Updated
- Sep 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Project Jupyter
- Product
- nbconvert
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 18, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 6.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub Security Lab nbconvert XSS proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo