Remote denial of service via IPv6 loop
Published Apr 22, 2021 · Updated Mar 11, 2025
Denial-of-service in Siemens Nucleus NET IPv6 processing allows remote attackers to interrupt service via crafted Hop-by-Hop packets. The IPv6 Hop-by-Hop extension-header handler accepts arbitrary length values without validating header bounds, so packet processing can loop indefinitely. No authentication or user interaction is required, and the bounded consequence is a network-service hang rather than stated data disclosure or modification.
Summary
What happened
Denial-of-service in Siemens Nucleus NET IPv6 processing allows remote attackers to interrupt service via crafted Hop-by-Hop packets. The IPv6 Hop-by-Hop extension-header handler accepts arbitrary length values without validating header bounds, so packet processing can loop indefinitely. No authentication or user interaction is required, and the bounded consequence is a network-service hang rather than stated data disclosure or modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-25664
- Published
- Apr 22, 2021
- Updated
- Mar 11, 2025
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- Capital Embedded AR Classic
- Classifications
- CWE-835, T1498
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 22, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 11, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <*
- Affected versionversion=0 <V2303
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo