Remote service crash via fragmented UDP response assertion
Published Aug 18, 2021 · Updated Sep 17, 2024
Reachable assertion in ISC BIND 9 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and 9.16.19-S1 allows remote attackers to crash named via a DNS query. When RRL is active, named asserts while preparing a UDP response larger than the effective interface MTU, terminating the server process. Exposure requires an oversized UDP response caused by max-udp-size configuration or path MTU discovery; the result is a DNS service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Reachable assertion in ISC BIND 9 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and 9.16.19-S1 allows remote attackers to crash named via a DNS query. When RRL is active, named asserts while preparing a UDP response larger than the effective interface MTU, terminating the server process. Exposure requires an oversized UDP response caused by max-udp-size configuration or path MTU discovery; the result is a DNS service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-25218
- Published
- Aug 18, 2021
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2024
- Vendor
- Internet Systems Consortium
- Product
- BIND 9
- Classifications
- CWE-617, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 18, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 17, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Development Branch 9.17.16
- Affected versionversion=Stable Branch 9.16.19
- Affected versionversion=Supported Preview Edition 9.16.19-S1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo