Heap corruption via inconsistent integer-width calculations
Published Apr 14, 2022 · Updated Apr 15, 2025
Heap overflow in CHITUBOX AnyCubic Plugin 1.0.0 and CHITUBOX Basic 1.8.1 allows attackers to corrupt memory via a crafted GF file. GfFile::readDatHeadVec truncates a header-derived multiplication to 32 bits when sizing a vector, then uses a 64-bit result for the fread length, so the file data exceeds the allocation. A user must open the file; the demonstrated consequence is a process abort from heap corruption.
Summary
What happened
Heap overflow in CHITUBOX AnyCubic Plugin 1.0.0 and CHITUBOX Basic 1.8.1 allows attackers to corrupt memory via a crafted GF file. GfFile::readDatHeadVec truncates a header-derived multiplication to 32 bits when sizing a vector, then uses a 64-bit result for the fread length, so the file data exceeds the allocation. A user must open the file; the demonstrated consequence is a process abort from heap corruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21948
- Published
- Apr 14, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2025
- Vendor
- Anycubic
- Product
- CHITUBOX AnyCubic Plugin
- Classifications
- CWE-122, CWE-190, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 14, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos crash proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo