Local code execution via unchecked file path copy
Published Aug 13, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Stack buffer overflow in AT&T Labs XMill 0.7 allows local users to execute code through an oversized command-line file argument. On Linux, HandleFileArg passes the user-controlled filepattern directly to strcpy, which copies it into the 400-byte fullpath stack buffer without a length check. Exploitation requires local command execution and can corrupt the process stack, causing a crash or attacker-controlled code execution in the XMill process.
Summary
What happened
Stack buffer overflow in AT&T Labs XMill 0.7 allows local users to execute code through an oversized command-line file argument. On Linux, HandleFileArg passes the user-controlled filepattern directly to strcpy, which copies it into the 400-byte fullpath stack buffer without a length check. Exploitation requires local command execution and can corrupt the process stack, causing a crash or attacker-controlled code execution in the XMill process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21815
- Published
- Aug 13, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- AT&T Labs
- Product
- XMill
- Classifications
- CWE-787, CWE-120, T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 13, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Talos oversized command-line argument proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo