Local code execution via unchecked path copy
Published Aug 13, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Stack-based buffer overflow in AT&T Labs XMill 0.7 allows local users to execute code via a crafted command-line file pattern. On Windows, HandleFileArg passes a user-controlled path prefix and its unchecked length to memcpy, which writes beyond the 400-byte fullpath stack buffer. Exploitation requires local command-line access and a file pattern containing a path separator and wildcard; the referenced file does not need to exist.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in AT&T Labs XMill 0.7 allows local users to execute code via a crafted command-line file pattern. On Windows, HandleFileArg passes a user-controlled path prefix and its unchecked length to memcpy, which writes beyond the 400-byte fullpath stack buffer. Exploitation requires local command-line access and a file pattern containing a path separator and wildcard; the referenced file does not need to exist.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21813
- Published
- Aug 13, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- AT&T Labs
- Product
- XMill
- Classifications
- CWE-120
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 13, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos command-line crash reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo