Message compromise via exposed keys and faulty verification
Published Mar 19, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Cryptographic flaws in parabirb wrongthink before 2.2.0 allow remote attackers to compromise message confidentiality. The connection fingerprint exposes part of the secret identity key, the safety number incorporates only part of one public identity key instead of both keys, and DSA keys are only 1024 bits. Exploitation requires a user to connect or verify a peer, enabling interception or manipulation of supposedly end-to-end encrypted messages.
Summary
What happened
Cryptographic flaws in parabirb wrongthink before 2.2.0 allow remote attackers to compromise message confidentiality. The connection fingerprint exposes part of the secret identity key, the safety number incorporates only part of one public identity key instead of both keys, and DSA keys are only 1024 bits. Exploitation requires a user to connect or verify a peer, enabling interception or manipulation of supposedly end-to-end encrypted messages.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21387
- Published
- Mar 19, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Birb Digital
- Product
- Wrongthink
- Classifications
- CWE-319, CWE-326, CWE-358, T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 19, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 2.0.0, < 2.2.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo