Process crash via failed SDP renegotiation
Published Mar 10, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Denial of service in PJSIP PJPROJECT 2.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to crash a SIP application through crafted 183 responses. The pjmedia_sdp_neg_modify_local_offer2 function reuses a null active_local_sdp after an earlier SDP negotiation fails, and pj_strdup dereferences that null source while a later answer is processed. Exploitation requires a victim-initiated INVITE and two 183 responses; the first must fail SDP negotiation, after which the second terminates the affected process.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in PJSIP PJPROJECT 2.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to crash a SIP application through crafted 183 responses. The pjmedia_sdp_neg_modify_local_offer2 function reuses a null active_local_sdp after an earlier SDP negotiation fails, and pj_strdup dereferences that null source while a later answer is processed. Exploitation requires a victim-initiated INVITE and two 183 responses; the first must fail SDP negotiation, after which the second terminates the affected process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21375
- Published
- Mar 10, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- PJSIP
- Product
- PJPROJECT
- Classifications
- CWE-400, CWE-754, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 10, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 2.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Two-response SDP negotiation crash sequenceproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo