Service crash via unvalidated RPL address pointer
Published Jun 18, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Out-of-bounds write in Contiki-NG before 4.6 allows remote attackers to crash an RPL node via a crafted source-routing packet. In RPL-Classic and RPL-Lite, rpl_ext_header_srh_update derives addr_ptr from an unvalidated CMPR field and passes it to memcpy as the destination. The attacker must inject a source-routing packet into the network stack; the demonstrated consequence is a segmentation fault.
Summary
What happened
Out-of-bounds write in Contiki-NG before 4.6 allows remote attackers to crash an RPL node via a crafted source-routing packet. In RPL-Classic and RPL-Lite, rpl_ext_header_srh_update derives addr_ptr from an unvalidated CMPR field and passes it to memcpy as the destination. The attacker must inject a source-routing packet into the network stack; the demonstrated consequence is a segmentation fault.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21257
- Published
- Jun 18, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Contiki-NG
- Product
- Contiki-NG
- Classifications
- CWE-787, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 18, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 4.6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Contiki-NG source-routing-header test packetproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo