Authentication bypass via attacker-supplied signature key
Published Jan 21, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Improper signature verification in IdentityPython PySAML2 6.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to forge signed SAML documents. CryptoBackendXmlSec1 invokes xmlsec1 without restricting accepted key data, so verification can trust an attacker-supplied HMAC key or embedded certificate instead of the configured X.509 certificate. The target must process the crafted document with the default backend, which allows attackers to substitute trusted SAML assertion contents and impersonate a federated identity.
Summary
What happened
Improper signature verification in IdentityPython PySAML2 6.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to forge signed SAML documents. CryptoBackendXmlSec1 invokes xmlsec1 without restricting accepted key data, so verification can trust an attacker-supplied HMAC key or embedded certificate instead of the configured X.509 certificate. The target must process the crafted document with the default backend, which allows attackers to substitute trusted SAML assertion contents and impersonate a federated identity.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-21239
- Published
- Jan 21, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- IdentityPython
- Product
- PySAML2
- Classifications
- T1606.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 21, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 6.5.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Upstream HMAC and embedded-certificate regression fixturesproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo