Application crash via crafted device reply
Published Feb 19, 2021 · Updated Jun 12, 2025
Heap-based buffer overflow in Mitsubishi Electric FA engineering software allows remote attackers to crash applications with crafted replies. The vendor identifies the locus only as processing of spoofed MELSEC, GOT, or FREQROL reply packets and does not disclose the affected function or failed bounds check. Exploitation requires a product to accept a malicious device reply; code execution remains unconfirmed, while application denial of service is reproduced.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in Mitsubishi Electric FA engineering software allows remote attackers to crash applications with crafted replies. The vendor identifies the locus only as processing of spoofed MELSEC, GOT, or FREQROL reply packets and does not disclose the affected function or failed bounds check. Exploitation requires a product to accept a malicious device reply; code execution remains unconfirmed, while application denial of service is reproduced.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-20587
- Published
- Feb 19, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 12, 2025
- Vendor
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- Product
- MELSOFT PX Developer
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 19, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 12, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.53F and prior
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo