Authenticated client impersonation via unchecked global_id reclaim
Published Apr 15, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Improper authentication in Ceph allows remote authenticated users to impersonate clients and disrupt cluster services. Ceph monitors fail to validate the old cephx ticket when a reconnecting client reclaims a global_id, permitting reuse of an identifier held by another client. Exploitation requires a valid cluster key, a known or guessed global_id, modified client code, and crafted requests; successful use grants partial impersonation and can interrupt clients or daemons.
Summary
What happened
Improper authentication in Ceph allows remote authenticated users to impersonate clients and disrupt cluster services. Ceph monitors fail to validate the old cephx ticket when a reconnecting client reclaims a global_id, permitting reuse of an identifier held by another client. Exploitation requires a valid cluster key, a known or guessed global_id, modified client code, and crafted requests; successful use grants partial impersonation and can interrupt clients or daemons.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-20288
- Published
- Apr 15, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Ceph
- Product
- Ceph
- Classifications
- CWE-287, T1078
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 15, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=ceph 14.2.20
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo