Mailbox data theft and deletion via path traversal
Published Feb 23, 2021 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Path traversal in Isync Project mbsync before 1.3.5 and 1.4.0 allows remote attackers controlling an IMAP server to steal or delete local mail. The IMAP LIST/LSUB handler accepts '..' components in server-supplied mailbox names and maps them across the synchronization channel without rejecting traversal outside the selected mailbox. The channel Pattern must contain '*'; local Maildir impact also depends on SubFolders mode, and exposed messages can be copied to the server or deleted.
Summary
What happened
Path traversal in Isync Project mbsync before 1.3.5 and 1.4.0 allows remote attackers controlling an IMAP server to steal or delete local mail. The IMAP LIST/LSUB handler accepts '..' components in server-supplied mailbox names and maps them across the synchronization channel without rejecting traversal outside the selected mailbox. The channel Pattern must contain '*'; local Maildir impact also depends on SubFolders mode, and exposed messages can be copied to the server or deleted.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-20247
- Published
- Feb 23, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Isync Project
- Product
- mbsync
- Classifications
- CWE-22, CWE-20, T1005
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 23, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=before 1.35
- Affected versionversion=before 1.4.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo