Unauthenticated root code execution via crafted HTTP requests
Published Feb 4, 2021 · Updated Nov 8, 2024
Improper input validation in Cisco RV160 and RV260 series router firmware before 1.0.01.02 allows remote attackers to execute code as root. The web-based management interface accepts crafted HTTP requests without properly validating their parameters, but Cisco has not disclosed the affected handler or exact parsing error. No authentication or user interaction is required; successful exploitation grants root-level control of the router.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in Cisco RV160 and RV260 series router firmware before 1.0.01.02 allows remote attackers to execute code as root. The web-based management interface accepts crafted HTTP requests without properly validating their parameters, but Cisco has not disclosed the affected handler or exact parsing error. No authentication or user interaction is required; successful exploitation grants root-level control of the router.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2021-1294
- Published
- Feb 4, 2021
- Updated
- Nov 8, 2024
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware
- Classifications
- CWE-472, CAPEC-31, CAPEC-226, CAPEC-146, CAPEC-39, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 4, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 8, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo