Session theft via unsanitized testimonial client fields
Published Feb 3, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Stored XSS in WPChill Strong Testimonials before 2.40.1 allows remote attackers to execute scripts through testimonial client fields. The plugin stores custom[client_name] and custom[company_name] without adequate neutralization and renders them in testimonial pages; client_name also reaches the administrative testimonial list. A victim must view a submitted or edited testimonial, after which the script runs in that victim's browser and can steal session tokens or perform actions with the victim's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in WPChill Strong Testimonials before 2.40.1 allows remote attackers to execute scripts through testimonial client fields. The plugin stores custom[client_name] and custom[company_name] without adequate neutralization and renders them in testimonial pages; client_name also reaches the administrative testimonial list. A victim must view a submitted or edited testimonial, after which the script runs in that victim's browser and can steal session tokens or perform actions with the victim's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-8549
- Published
- Feb 3, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 3, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Exploit-DB 48076 Strong Testimonials stored XSS proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo