Arbitrary command execution via shell-joined options
Published Mar 15, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
OS command injection in gulp-tape 1.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands through crafted plugin options. The gulpTape flush function converts options with dargs, joins them into a shell command string, and passes that string to child_process.exec without neutralizing shell metacharacters. Exploitation requires influence over options supplied by a consuming Gulp build, and injected commands run with the build process's privileges.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in gulp-tape 1.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands through crafted plugin options. The gulpTape flush function converts options with dargs, joins them into a shell command string, and passes that string to child_process.exec without neutralizing shell metacharacters. Exploitation requires influence over options supplied by a consuming Gulp build, and injected commands run with the build process's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-7605
- Published
- Mar 15, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Yuan Qing Lim
- Product
- gulp-tape
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 15, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=All versions including 1.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Snyk gulp-tape name-option proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo