Authenticated unauthorized server requests via direct-print applet
Published Jun 8, 2020 · Updated Sep 17, 2024
Server-side request forgery in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 allows remote authenticated users to send unauthorized requests. The direct-print applet path accepts an attacker-selected outbound destination without adequately restricting where the server connects. Application access and enabled applet printing are required, and resulting server-originated requests expose reachable services to network enumeration or use in further attacks.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 allows remote authenticated users to send unauthorized requests. The direct-print applet path accepts an attacker-selected outbound destination without adequately restricting where the server connects. Application access and enabled applet printing are required, and resulting server-originated requests expose reachable services to network enumeration or use in further attacks.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-4529
- Published
- Jun 8, 2020
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2024
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- IBM Maximo Asset Management
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 8, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 17, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=7.6.0
- Affected versionversion=7.6.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo