Authenticated command injection via unvalidated script input
Published Jun 18, 2020 · Updated Nov 15, 2024
Command injection in Cisco Small Business RV routers allows remote authenticated users with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary commands. The web management interface passes user-supplied input to scripts without proper validation, allowing crafted requests to reach the underlying operating system as root. Exploitation requires valid administrative access to the management interface; successful attacks can read, modify, or disrupt device operation through root-level command execution.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Cisco Small Business RV routers allows remote authenticated users with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary commands. The web management interface passes user-supplied input to scripts without proper validation, allowing crafted requests to reach the underlying operating system as root. Exploitation requires valid administrative access to the management interface; successful attacks can read, modify, or disrupt device operation through root-level command execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-3279
- Published
- Jun 18, 2020
- Updated
- Nov 15, 2024
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware
- Classifications
- CWE-77, CWE-78, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 18, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 15, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Proof-of-concept exploit codeproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo