HTTP response header injection via unvalidated URL input
Published May 6, 2020 · Updated Nov 15, 2024
CRLF injection in the Cisco Umbrella web server allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP response headers through a crafted URL. The web server insufficiently validates URL input, allowing carriage-return and line-feed characters to become header delimiters in responses sent to a user's browser. Exploitation requires a user to open the crafted URL, and the established consequence is modification of response headers rather than server compromise.
Summary
What happened
CRLF injection in the Cisco Umbrella web server allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP response headers through a crafted URL. The web server insufficiently validates URL input, allowing carriage-return and line-feed characters to become header delimiters in responses sent to a user's browser. Exploitation requires a user to open the crafted URL, and the established consequence is modification of response headers rather than server compromise.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-3246
- Published
- May 6, 2020
- Updated
- Nov 15, 2024
- Vendor
- Cisco Systems, Inc.
- Product
- Cisco Umbrella
- Classifications
- CWE-74, CWE-93, CAPEC-15, CAPEC-81
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 6, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 15, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo