Code execution via trusted Office Art record length
Published Feb 23, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Heap-based buffer overflow in PlanMaker 2021 revision 1014 allows attackers to corrupt memory by inducing a victim to open a crafted Excel file. CEscherObject::ReadNativeProperties trusts the 32-bit length of a version/instance 0x001e record and copies more than 0x1d4 bytes into a fixed-size object member. Opening the file is required, and the resulting heap corruption can crash the application or enable code execution in its context.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in PlanMaker 2021 revision 1014 allows attackers to corrupt memory by inducing a victim to open a crafted Excel file. CEscherObject::ReadNativeProperties trusts the 32-bit length of a version/instance 0x001e record and copies more than 0x1d4 bytes into a fixed-size object member. Opening the file is required, and the resulting heap corruption can crash the application or enable code execution in its context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-28587
- Published
- Feb 23, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- SoftMaker Software GmbH
- Product
- PlanMaker
- Classifications
- CWE-122, CWE-787, T1204.002, T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 23, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=SoftMaker Software GmbH SoftMaker Office PlanMaker 2021 (Revision 1014)
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos crafted Excel document proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo