Code execution via trusted Office Art record length
Published Feb 10, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Heap-based buffer overflow in SoftMaker Software GmbH PlanMaker 2021 Revision 1014 allows attackers to execute code through a crafted file. In CEscherObject::ReadNativeProperties, handlers for Version/Instance 0x0005 and 0x0016 trust a uint32 record length and copy stream data into an approximately 0xec-byte object member. Exploitation requires a victim to open the malicious document and runs code in the context of the PlanMaker process.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in SoftMaker Software GmbH PlanMaker 2021 Revision 1014 allows attackers to execute code through a crafted file. In CEscherObject::ReadNativeProperties, handlers for Version/Instance 0x0005 and 0x0016 trust a uint32 record length and copy stream data into an approximately 0xec-byte object member. Exploitation requires a victim to open the malicious document and runs code in the context of the PlanMaker process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-27250
- Published
- Feb 10, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- SoftMaker Software GmbH
- Product
- PlanMaker
- Classifications
- CWE-122, CWE-787, T1203, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 10, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=SoftMaker Software GmbH SoftMaker Office PlanMaker 2021 (Revision 1014)
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos malformed Office Art record proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo