Security-control bypass via whitespace URL parsing
Published Mar 19, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
HTTP request smuggling in Squid 2.0 through 4.13 and 5.0.1 through 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to access services blocked by proxy controls. AnyP::Uri::parse fails to prefix path-rootless and path-noscheme request targets with a slash, allowing Squid and an origin server to disagree on request boundaries after URI whitespace handling. The client must be permitted by http_access, and uri_whitespace must be absent or set to allow, chop, or strip; the bounded result is unauthorized service access.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Squid 2.0 through 4.13 and 5.0.1 through 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to access services blocked by proxy controls. AnyP::Uri::parse fails to prefix path-rootless and path-noscheme request targets with a slash, allowing Squid and an origin server to disagree on request boundaries after URI whitespace handling. The client must be permitted by http_access, and uri_whitespace must be absent or set to allow, chop, or strip; the bounded result is unauthorized service access.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-25097
- Published
- Mar 19, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- T1210
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 19, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo