Trusted-data injection via missing TLS hostname validation
Published Feb 19, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
TLS hostname validation failure in voloko twitter-stream 0.1.10 and 0.1.16 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to inject data via interception. The library configures EventMachine TLS without checking that the server certificate matches stream.twitter.com, so a TLS endpoint with a mismatched certificate is accepted. Man-in-the-middle attackers must redirect the client's connection to a controlled TLS endpoint; successful interception exposes authentication material and inserts malicious stream data into trusted processing.
Summary
What happened
TLS hostname validation failure in voloko twitter-stream 0.1.10 and 0.1.16 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to inject data via interception. The library configures EventMachine TLS without checking that the server certificate matches stream.twitter.com, so a TLS endpoint with a mismatched certificate is accepted. Man-in-the-middle attackers must redirect the client's connection to a controlled TLS endpoint; successful interception exposes authentication material and inserts malicious stream data into trusted processing.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-24392
- Published
- Feb 19, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-297, CWE-295, T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 19, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub Security Lab TLS interception proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo