Unauthenticated request smuggling via conflicting length headers
Published Mar 23, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
HTTP request smuggling in Apache Traffic Server allows remote attackers to desynchronize proxy and origin HTTP message boundaries. The HTTP/1.1 request-framing path accepts conflicting Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers, so downstream software can assign a different length to the same request. No authentication or user interaction is required; a crafted message can conceal another request and expose or alter traffic on a reused back-end connection.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Apache Traffic Server allows remote attackers to desynchronize proxy and origin HTTP message boundaries. The HTTP/1.1 request-framing path accepts conflicting Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers, so downstream software can assign a different length to the same request. No authentication or user interaction is required; a crafted message can conceal another request and expose or alter traffic on a reused back-end connection.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-1944
- Published
- Mar 23, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache Traffic Server
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 23, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.3, 7.0.0 to 7.1.8, and 8.0.0 to 8.0.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- HDiff HTTP semantic-gap testing frameworkproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo